How to Upload From Client to Server in R

Standard protocol for transferring files over TCP/IP networks

File Transfer Protocol
Communication protocol
Purpose File transfer
Programmer(s) Abhay Bhushan for RFC 959
Introduction April 16, 1971; 50 years ago  (1971-04-16)
OSI layer Application layer
Port(s) 21 for control, 20 for data transfer
RFC(south) RFC 959

The File Transfer Protocol (FTP) is a standard communication protocol used for the transfer of figurer files from a server to a client on a computer network. FTP is built on a client–server model architecture using separate control and information connections betwixt the client and the server.[ane] FTP users may authenticate themselves with a clear-text sign-in protocol, usually in the form of a username and password, simply can connect anonymously if the server is configured to let it. For secure transmission that protects the username and password, and encrypts the content, FTP is oft secured with SSL/TLS (FTPS) or replaced with SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP).

The first FTP client applications were command-line programs adult before operating systems had graphical user interfaces, and are still shipped with most Windows, Unix, and Linux operating systems.[ii] [3] Many FTP clients and automation utilities have since been developed for desktops, servers, mobile devices, and hardware, and FTP has been incorporated into productivity applications, such as HTML editors.

In January 2021, support for the FTP protocol was disabled in Google Chrome 88,[4] and disabled in Firefox 88.0.[5] In July 2021, Firefox xc dropped FTP entirely,[6] and Google followed adjust in October 2021, removing FTP entirely in Google Chrome 95.[7]

History of FTP servers [edit]

The original specification for the File Transfer Protocol was written by Abhay Bhushan and published equally RFC 114 on 16 April 1971. Until 1980, FTP ran on NCP, the predecessor of TCP/IP.[two] The protocol was later on replaced by a TCP/IP version, RFC 765 (June 1980) and RFC 959 (October 1985), the current specification. Several proposed standards amend RFC 959, for example RFC 1579 (Feb 1994) enables Firewall-Friendly FTP (passive mode), RFC 2228 (June 1997) proposes security extensions, RFC 2428 (September 1998) adds support for IPv6 and defines a new blazon of passive mode.[eight]

Protocol overview [edit]

Advice and information transfer [edit]

Illustration of starting a passive connectedness using port 21

FTP may run in active or passive fashion, which determines how the data connectedness is established.[nine] (This sense of "mode" is different from that of the Way control in the FTP protocol, and corresponds to the PORT/PASV/EPSV/etc commands instead.) In both cases, the client creates a TCP command connection from a random, usually an unprivileged, port North to the FTP server command port 21.

  • In active mode, the customer starts listening for incoming information connections from the server on port Yard. Information technology sends the FTP control PORT M to inform the server on which port information technology is listening. The server so initiates a data channel to the client from its port 20, the FTP server data port.
  • In situations where the client is backside a firewall and unable to take incoming TCP connections, passive manner may be used. In this fashion, the client uses the control connection to ship a PASV control to the server and then receives a server IP accost and server port number from the server,[nine] which the client then uses to open a data connectedness from an capricious client port to the server IP address and server port number received.[10]

Both modes were updated in September 1998 to support IPv6. Further changes were introduced to the passive mode at that time, updating it to extended passive mode.[11]

The server responds over the control connectedness with three-digit status codes in ASCII with an optional text bulletin. For example, "200" (or "200 OK") means that the last command was successful. The numbers represent the code for the response and the optional text represents a human-readable explanation or request (east.thousand. <Demand account for storing file>).[1] An ongoing transfer of file data over the information connexion can be aborted using an interrupt message sent over the control connection.

FTP needs ii ports (one for sending and 1 for receiving) because it was originally designed to operate on Network Command Program (NCP), which was a simplex protocol that utilized two port addresses, establishing two connections, for two-mode communications. An odd and an even port were reserved for each application layer application or protocol. The standardization of TCP and UDP reduced the need for the employ of two simplex ports for each awarding down to one duplex port,[12] : 15 but the FTP protocol was never altered to only utilize ane port, and connected using two for backwards compatibility.

NAT and firewall traversal [edit]

FTP commonly transfers data by having the server connect back to the client, later the PORT control is sent by the client. This is problematic for both NATs and firewalls, which practise not allow connections from the Internet towards internal hosts.[thirteen] For NATs, an boosted complication is that the representation of the IP addresses and port number in the PORT command refer to the internal host's IP address and port, rather than the public IP address and port of the NAT.

There are two approaches to solve this trouble. One is that the FTP client and FTP server use the PASV command, which causes the information connection to be established from the FTP customer to the server.[13] This is widely used by modern FTP clients. Another approach is for the NAT to alter the values of the PORT command, using an application-level gateway for this purpose.[13]

Data types [edit]

While transferring information over the network, four data types are defined:[two] [three] [viii]

  • ASCII (TYPE A): Used for text. Information is converted, if needed, from the sending host'southward character representation to "8-chip ASCII" before transmission, and (once more, if necessary) to the receiving host'southward character representation. As a upshot, this fashion is inappropriate for files that contain data other than plainly text.
  • Prototype (TYPE I, normally called Binary mode): The sending machine sends each file byte by byte, and the recipient stores the bytestream as it receives it. (Image fashion support has been recommended for all implementations of FTP).
  • EBCDIC (Type Due east): Used for plain text between hosts using the EBCDIC character set.
  • Local (TYPE L northward): Designed to back up file transfer between machines which do not use 8-scrap bytes, e.g. 36-bit systems such every bit December PDP-10s. For example, "Blazon L 9" would be used to transfer information in ix-flake bytes, or "TYPE L 36" to transfer 36-bit words. Most contemporary FTP clients/servers only support L 8, which is equivalent to I.

An expired Net Draft defined a TYPE U for transferring Unicode text files using UTF-viii;[fourteen] although the typhoon never became an RFC, it has been implemented by several FTP clients/servers.

Notation these data types are ordinarily called "modes", although ambiguously that word is besides used to refer to active-vs-passive communication fashion (meet above), and the modes set by the FTP protocol Manner control (run into beneath).

For text files (Type A and TYPE E), iii different format control options are provided, to control how the file would be printed:

  • Non-print (TYPE A N and TYPE E North) – the file does not contain any wagon control characters intended for a printer
  • Telnet (TYPE A T and TYPE E T) – the file contains Telnet (or in other words, ASCII C0) railroad vehicle command characters (CR, LF, etc)
  • ASA (Type A A and Blazon Due east A) – the file contains ASA railroad vehicle control characters

These formats were mainly relevant to line printers; most contemporary FTP clients/servers only back up the default format control of N.

File structures [edit]

File organization is specified using the STRU command. The following file structures are defined in department 3.1.i of RFC959:

  • F or FILE structure (stream-oriented). Files are viewed as an arbitrary sequence of bytes, characters or words. This is the usual file structure on Unix systems and other systems such equally CP/Grand, MS-DOS and Microsoft Windows. (Department three.1.1.one)
  • R or RECORD construction (record-oriented). Files are viewed as divided into records, which may be fixed or variable length. This file organization is common on mainframe and midrange systems, such as MVS, VM/CMS, Os/400 and VMS, which support tape-oriented filesystems.
  • P or Folio structure (page-oriented). Files are divided into pages, which may either contain data or metadata; each page may also take a header giving diverse attributes. This file structure was specifically designed for TENEX systems, and is generally not supported on other platforms. RFC1123 section 4.1.two.three recommends that this structure non be implemented.

Most gimmicky FTP clients and servers only support STRU F. STRU R is still in employ in mainframe and minicomputer file transfer applications.

Data transfer modes [edit]

Data transfer can be done in any of three modes:[one] [two]

  • Stream fashion (MODE Southward): Information is sent equally a continuous stream, relieving FTP from doing any processing. Rather, all processing is left up to TCP. No Stop-of-file indicator is needed, unless the data is divided into records.
  • Block mode (MODE B): Designed primarily for transferring tape-oriented files (STRU R), although can also be used to transfer stream-oriented (STRU F) text files. FTP puts each record (or line) of data into several blocks (cake header, byte count, and data field) and so passes information technology on to TCP.[8]
  • Compressed mode (MODE C): Extends Manner B with information pinch using run-length encoding.

Almost contemporary FTP clients and servers do non implement Fashion B or Manner C; FTP clients and servers for mainframe and minicomputer operating systems are the exception to that.

Some FTP software also implements a DEFLATE-based compressed fashion, sometimes called "Mode Z" afterwards the control that enables it. This way was described in an Internet Draft, but not standardized.[xv]

GridFTP defines boosted modes, MODE Eastward[xvi] and MODE Ten,[17] as extensions of MODE B.

Additional commands [edit]

More recent implementations of FTP support the Modify Fact: Modification Time (MFMT) command, which allows a customer to adjust that file attribute remotely, enabling the preservation of that attribute when uploading files.[18] [19]

To call back a remote file timestamp, there's MDTM command. Some servers (and clients) support nonstandard syntax of the MDTM control with ii arguments, that works the same fashion as MFMT [20]

Login [edit]

FTP login uses normal username and countersign scheme for granting access.[2] The username is sent to the server using the USER command, and the password is sent using the Laissez passer control.[ii] This sequence is unencrypted "on the wire", so may be vulnerable to a network sniffing assail.[21] If the information provided by the client is accepted by the server, the server volition send a greeting to the customer and the session will commence.[2] If the server supports information technology, users may log in without providing login credentials, just the same server may authorize but limited access for such sessions.[2]

Anonymous FTP [edit]

A host that provides an FTP service may provide anonymous FTP admission.[2] Users typically log into the service with an 'anonymous' (lower-case and case-sensitive in some FTP servers) account when prompted for user name. Although users are commonly asked to send their email address instead of a countersign,[3] no verification is actually performed on the supplied data.[22] Many FTP hosts whose purpose is to provide software updates will allow anonymous logins.[iii]

Differences from HTTP [edit]

HTTP substantially fixes the bugs in FTP that made it inconvenient to utilize for many small imperceptible transfers as are typical in web pages.

FTP has a stateful control connectedness which maintains a current working directory and other flags, and each transfer requires a secondary connection through which the information are transferred. In "passive" manner this secondary connection is from client to server, whereas in the default "active" style this connection is from server to client. This credible role reversal when in active mode, and random port numbers for all transfers, is why firewalls and NAT gateways take such a hard time with FTP. HTTP is stateless and multiplexes control and information over a single connection from client to server on well-known port numbers, which trivially passes through NAT gateways and is uncomplicated for firewalls to manage.

Setting up an FTP control connection is quite deadening due to the round-trip delays of sending all of the required commands and awaiting responses, so it is customary to bring up a control connection and hold it open for multiple file transfers rather than drib and re-plant the session anew each time. In dissimilarity, HTTP originally dropped the connectedness later each transfer because doing so was so inexpensive. While HTTP has subsequently gained the power to reuse the TCP connection for multiple transfers, the conceptual model is notwithstanding of independent requests rather than a session.

When FTP is transferring over the data connection, the command connection is idle. If the transfer takes too long, the firewall or NAT may decide that the command connection is dead and stop tracking it, effectively breaking the connection and disruptive the download. The single HTTP connectedness is only idle between requests and it is normal and expected for such connections to be dropped after a time-out.

Software support [edit]

Web browser [edit]

Most common web browsers can retrieve files hosted on FTP servers, although they may non support protocol extensions such as FTPS.[iii] [23] When an FTP—rather than an HTTP—URL is supplied, the accessible contents on the remote server are presented in a fashion that is similar to that used for other web content. FireFTP is an browser extension designed as a full-featured FTP customer, it could exist run within Firefox in the past, but information technology's at present recommend working with Waterfox.

Google Chrome removed FTP support entirely in Chrome 88.[24] As of 2019, Mozilla was discussing proposals, including merely removing support for old FTP implementations that are no longer in use to simplify their code.[25] [26] In Apr, 2021, Mozilla released Firefox 88.0 which disabled FTP support by default.[27] In July 2021, Firefox ninety dropped FTP support entirely.[6]

Syntax [edit]

FTP URL syntax is described in RFC 1738, taking the form: ftp://[user[:password]@]host[:port]/url-path (the bracketed parts are optional).

For example, the URL ftp://public.ftp-servers.instance.com/mydirectory/myfile.txt represents the file myfile.txt from the directory mydirectory on the server public.ftp-servers.example.com as an FTP resources. The URL ftp://user001:secretpassword@private.ftp-servers.case.com/mydirectory/myfile.txt adds a specification of the username and password that must be used to access this resource.

More details on specifying a username and countersign may be establish in the browsers' documentation (east.thousand., Firefox[28] and Internet Explorer[29]). By default, most web browsers use passive (PASV) mode, which more easily traverses end-user firewalls.

Some variation has existed in how different browsers treat path resolution in cases where there is a non-root home directory for a user.[xxx]

Download manager [edit]

Well-nigh common download managers can receive files hosted on FTP servers, while some of them also requite the interface to call up the files hosted on FTP servers. DownloadStudio and Net Download Accelerator allows not just download a file from FTP server but also view the list of files on a FTP server.[31] [32]

Security [edit]

FTP was not designed to be a secure protocol, and has many security weaknesses.[33] In May 1999, the authors of RFC 2577 listed a vulnerability to the following problems:

  • Brute-forcefulness attack
  • FTP bounce assault
  • Packet capture
  • Port stealing (guessing the adjacent open port and usurping a legitimate connection)
  • Spoofing attack
  • Username enumeration
  • DoS or DDoS

FTP does not encrypt its traffic; all transmissions are in clear text, and usernames, passwords, commands and information can be read by anyone able to perform packet capture (sniffing) on the network.[two] [33] This trouble is common to many of the Internet Protocol specifications (such as SMTP, Telnet, POP and IMAP) that were designed prior to the creation of encryption mechanisms such equally TLS or SSL.[viii]

Common solutions to this problem include:

  1. Using the secure versions of the insecure protocols, e.g., FTPS instead of FTP and TelnetS instead of Telnet.
  2. Using a different, more secure protocol that can handle the job, e.g. SSH File Transfer Protocol or Secure Copy Protocol.
  3. Using a secure tunnel such as Secure Shell (SSH) or virtual private network (VPN).

FTP over SSH [edit]

FTP over SSH is the practise of tunneling a normal FTP session over a Secure Shell connectedness.[33] Because FTP uses multiple TCP connections (unusual for a TCP/IP protocol that is yet in utilize), information technology is particularly difficult to tunnel over SSH. With many SSH clients, attempting to gear up upward a tunnel for the command channel (the initial client-to-server connection on port 21) will protect only that channel; when data is transferred, the FTP software at either end sets upwards new TCP connections (information channels) and thus have no confidentiality or integrity protection.

Otherwise, information technology is necessary for the SSH customer software to have specific knowledge of the FTP protocol, to monitor and rewrite FTP control aqueduct messages and autonomously open new packet forwardings for FTP data channels. Software packages that support this mode include:

  • Tectia ConnectSecure (Win/Linux/Unix)[34] of SSH Communications Security'due south software suite

Derivatives [edit]

FTPS [edit]

Explicit FTPS is an extension to the FTP standard that allows clients to request FTP sessions to be encrypted. This is done by sending the "AUTH TLS" command. The server has the option of allowing or denying connections that do non asking TLS. This protocol extension is divers in RFC 4217. Implicit FTPS is an outdated standard for FTP that required the apply of a SSL or TLS connection. It was specified to employ different ports than plain FTP.

SSH File Transfer Protocol [edit]

The SSH file transfer protocol (chronologically the 2nd of the 2 protocols abbreviated SFTP) transfers files and has a similar control set up for users, but uses the Secure Trounce protocol (SSH) to transfer files. Different FTP, information technology encrypts both commands and information, preventing passwords and sensitive information from being transmitted openly over the network. It cannot interoperate with FTP software.

Trivial File Transfer Protocol [edit]

Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP) is a simple, lock-step FTP that allows a customer to get a file from or put a file onto a remote host. One of its master uses is in the early stages of booting from a local area network, because TFTP is very simple to implement. TFTP lacks security and most of the advanced features offered by more robust file transfer protocols such as File Transfer Protocol. TFTP was first standardized in 1981 and the current specification for the protocol can exist found in RFC 1350.

Simple File Transfer Protocol [edit]

Simple File Transfer Protocol (the outset protocol abbreviated SFTP), as defined by RFC 913, was proposed every bit an (unsecured) file transfer protocol with a level of complication intermediate betwixt TFTP and FTP. It was never widely accepted on the Internet, and is now assigned Historic condition by the IETF. It runs through port 115, and ofttimes receives the initialism of SFTP. It has a command set of 11 commands and back up three types of data transmission: ASCII, binary and continuous. For systems with a discussion size that is a multiple of 8 bits, the implementation of binary and continuous is the same. The protocol besides supports login with user ID and password, hierarchical folders and file management (including rename, delete, upload, download, download with overwrite, and download with append).

FTP commands [edit]

FTP respond codes [edit]

Below is a summary of FTP reply codes that may exist returned by an FTP server. These codes have been standardized in RFC 959 by the IETF. The reply code is a iii-digit value. The first digit is used to indicate one of three possible outcomes — success, failure, or to signal an error or incomplete answer:

  • 2yz – Success reply
  • 4yz or 5yz – Failure reply
  • 1yz or 3yz – Error or Incomplete reply

The second digit defines the kind of mistake:

  • x0z – Syntax. These replies refer to syntax errors.
  • x1z – Data. Replies to requests for information.
  • x2z – Connections. Replies referring to the control and data connections.
  • x3z – Authentication and accounting. Replies for the login process and accounting procedures.
  • x4z – Not defined.
  • x5z – File system. These replies relay status codes from the server file organization.

The third digit of the reply code is used to provide additional particular for each of the categories defined by the second digit.

Come across likewise [edit]

  • Comparison of FTP client software
  • Comparison of FTP server software packages
  • Comparing of file transfer protocols
  • Curl-loader – FTP/S loading/testing open-source software
  • File eXchange Protocol (FXP)
  • File Service Protocol (FSP)
  • FTAM
  • FTPFS
  • List of FTP commands
  • List of FTP server return codes
  • Managed File Transfer
  • OBEX
  • Shared file access
  • TCP Wrapper

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b c Forouzan, B.A. (2000). TCP/IP: Protocol Suite (1st ed.). New Delhi, Republic of india: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Visitor Express.
  2. ^ a b c d due east f thousand h i j Kozierok, Charles M. (2005). "The TCP/IP Guide v3.0". Tcpipguide.com.
  3. ^ a b c d e Dean, Tamara (2010). Network+ Guide to Networks. Delmar. pp. 168–171.
  4. ^ "Deprecations and removals in Chrome 87". Retrieved 18 November 2020.
  5. ^ "Firefox 88.0, Run across All New Features, Updates and Fixes". Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  6. ^ a b Vonau, Manuel (7 July 2021). "Firefox follows in Chrome's footsteps and drops FTP support (APK Download)". Android Police . Retrieved 12 July 2021. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  7. ^ "Remove FTP support - Chrome Platform Condition". www.chromestatus.com . Retrieved 2 September 2021.
  8. ^ a b c d Clark, M.P. (2003). Information Networks IP and the Internet (1st ed.). Due west Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  9. ^ a b "Active FTP vs. Passive FTP, a Definitive Explanation". Slacksite.com.
  10. ^ RFC 959 (Standard) File Transfer Protocol (FTP). Postel, J. & Reynolds, J. (October 1985).
  11. ^ RFC 2428 (Proposed Standard) Extensions for IPv6, NAT, and Extended Passive Mode. Allman, M. & Metz, C. & Ostermann, Due south. (September 1998).
  12. ^ Stevens, W. Richard (1994). TCP/IP Illustrated Volume I. Vol. 1. Reading, Massachusetts, U.s.a.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Visitor. ISBN0-201-63346-9.
  13. ^ a b c Gleason, Mike (2005). "The File Transfer Protocol and Your Firewall/NAT". Ncftp.com.
  14. ^ Klensin, John. FTP Blazon Extension for Internationalized Text. I-D draft-klensin-ftpext-typeu-00. Retrieved 9 June 2020.
  15. ^ Preston, J. (Jan 2005). Deflate manual mode for FTP. IETF. I-D draft-preston-ftpext-deflate-03. Retrieved 27 Jan 2016.
  16. ^ Allcock, W. (April 2003). "GridFTP: Protocol Extensions to FTP for the Grid" (PDF).
  17. ^ Mandrichenko, I. (4 May 2005). "GridFTP v2 Protocol Description" (PDF).
  18. ^ "MFMT FTP control". support.solarwinds.com. 11 Oct 2018.
  19. ^ "FTP Commands: DSIZ, MFCT, MFMT, AVBL, Laissez passer, XPWD, XMKD | Serv-U". www.serv-u.com.
  20. ^ "MDTM FTP control". support.solarwinds.com. 11 October 2018.
  21. ^ Prince, Brian. "Should Organizations Retire FTP for Security?". Security Week. Security Week. Retrieved 14 September 2017.
  22. ^ RFC 1635 (Informational) How to Use Anonymous FTP. P. & Emtage, A. & Marine, A. (May 1994).
  23. ^ Matthews, J. (2005). Computer Networking: Internet Protocols in Activeness (1st ed.). Danvers, MA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  24. ^ Sneddon, Joey (26 Jan 2021). "Linux Release Roundup: GParted, Lightworks, Google Chrome + More than". omgubuntu.co.uk . Retrieved 30 January 2021.
  25. ^ "1574475 - Remove FTP support".
  26. ^ "Deprecate FTP support - Chrome Platform Status".
  27. ^ "See what's new in Firefox: 88.0 Firefox Release". mozilla.org. 19 April 2021. Retrieved 20 Apr 2021.
  28. ^ "Accessing FTP servers | How to | Firefox Help". Support.mozilla.com. v September 2012. Retrieved 16 January 2013.
  29. ^ "How to Enter FTP Site Password in Cyberspace Explorer". Archived from the original on 2 July 2015. Retrieved 13 February 2020. {{cite spider web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL condition unknown (link) Written for IE versions half-dozen and earlier. Might piece of work with newer versions.
  30. ^ Jukka "Yucca" Korpela (eighteen September 1997). "FTP URLs". "IT and communication" (jkorpela.fi). Retrieved 26 January 2020.
  31. ^ "DownloadStudio - Cyberspace Download Manager And Download Accelerator - Features". Conceiva. Retrieved nineteen Oct 2021.
  32. ^ "Net Download Accelerator | Features". WestByte. Retrieved 20 October 2021.
  33. ^ a b c "Securing FTP using SSH". Nurdletech.com.
  34. ^ "Components of the Information Assurance Platform (section Tectia ConnectSecure)". ssh.com. Archived from the original on 31 July 2020.

Further reading [edit]

  • RFC 697 – CWD Command of FTP. July 1975.
  • RFC 959 – (Standard) File Transfer Protocol (FTP). J. Postel, J. Reynolds. October 1985.
  • RFC 1579 – (Informational) Firewall-Friendly FTP. Feb 1994.
  • RFC 1635 – (Informational) How to Use Anonymous FTP. May 1994.
  • RFC 1639 – FTP Functioning Over Large Address Records (FOOBAR). June 1994.
  • RFC 1738 – Compatible Resources Locators (URL). Dec 1994.
  • RFC 2228 – (Proposed Standard) FTP Security Extensions. Oct 1997.
  • RFC 2389 – (Proposed Standard) Characteristic negotiation machinery for the File Transfer Protocol. Baronial 1998.
  • RFC 2428 – (Proposed Standard) Extensions for IPv6, NAT, and Extended passive mode. September 1998.
  • RFC 2577 – (Informational) FTP Security Considerations. May 1999.
  • RFC 2640 – (Proposed Standard) Internationalization of the File Transfer Protocol. July 1999.
  • RFC 3659 – (Proposed Standard) Extensions to FTP. P. Hethmon. March 2007.
  • RFC 5797 – (Proposed Standard) FTP Command and Extension Registry. March 2010.
  • RFC 7151 – (Proposed Standard) File Transfer Protocol HOST Control for Virtual Hosts. March 2014.
  • IANA FTP Commands and Extensions registry – The official registry of FTP Commands and Extensions

External links [edit]

  • Advice Networks/File Transfer Protocol at Wikibooks
  • FTP Server Online Tester Authentication, encryption, way and connectivity.
  • Bearding FTP Servers by Country Lawmaking TLD (2012): "Offbeat Internet - Public Admission - FTP". world wide web.jumpjet.info. 2012. Retrieved 16 Jan 2020.

gleasontander.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Transfer_Protocol

0 Response to "How to Upload From Client to Server in R"

Enviar um comentário

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel